Downloads · 30 days
29
31% of all-time downloads
Subalzt/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-abliterated-FP8
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-abliterated-FP8 is a text generation model from Subalzt. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
A research artifact: the "refusal direction" (Arditi et al. 2024, arXiv:2406.11717) removed from Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, then quantized to FP8. Its purpose is to measure the quality cost of abliteration with pair…
Downloads · 30 days
29
31% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
94
Public
Parameters
4.4B
5.2 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors5.2 GB · 100%
How the weights are stored.
F8_E4M33.6B · 82%
From the Hugging Face model README
A research artifact: the "refusal direction" (Arditi et al. 2024, arXiv:2406.11717) removed from Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, then quantized to FP8. Its purpose is to measure the quality cost of abliteration with paired statistics on held-out data — a number the ecosystem of "uncensored" uploads reports for essentially no one.
If you want a safety-aligned assistant, use the base model. This is an instrument for studying what abliteration does to a model, published with the measurements that justify that framing.
Closed-form, no training:
refusal_dir = normalize(mean(harmful) − mean(harmless)).embed_tokens, per-layer o_proj and mlp.down_proj): W ← W − r̂(r̂ᵀW).FP8_DYNAMIC, per-channel weights + per-token dynamic
activations, lm_head excluded) — identical recipe to the non-abliterated
FP8 sibling.Pipeline and eval code: https://github.com/Subalzt/qwen3-4b-quantized-fp8-gptq
Harness validated — the non-abliterated FP8 reproduced PPL 10.0415 to the digit.
| metric | base FP8 | this model | Δ | paired test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refusal (AdvBench held-out) | 100% | ~17% | −83 pp | intended effect |
| HumanEval pass@1 | 0.8659 | 0.8110 | −5.49 pp | McNemar p = 0.093 (not significant) |
| Perplexity (wikitext-2, ctx 2048) | 10.0415 | 11.9987 | +19.49% | paired t, p ≈ 2e-112 (145/145 chunks worse) |
The two capability metrics disagree, and that is the finding. A functional code eval sees no significant loss; a dense per-token perplexity measure sees a large, unambiguous degradation on every chunk. The +19.5% perplexity cost is roughly 6× the +3.04% cost of 4-bit GPTQ quantization on the same model — abliteration is a larger quality intervention than quantization itself.
Research on safety-tuning mechanisms, refusal-direction interpretability, quantization × behavioral-edit interaction, and robustness evaluation.
vllm serve Subalzt/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-abliterated-FP8 --max-model-len 8192
Arditi et al., Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction, 2024. Base model © Qwen, Apache-2.0.