Downloads · 30 days
1.2K
13% of all-time downloads
QuantFactory/Llama3-Med42-8B-GGUF
Llama3-Med42-8B-GGUF is a text generation model from QuantFactory. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. The card lists the license as llama3.
This is quantized version of m42-health/Llama3-Med42-8B created using llama.cpp
Downloads · 30 days
1.2K
13% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
9.6K
Public
Repo size
72.7 GB
Likes
3
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.gguf72.7 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This is quantized version of m42-health/Llama3-Med42-8B created using llama.cpp
Med42-v2 is a suite of open-access clinical large language models (LLM) instruct and preference-tuned by M42 to expand access to medical knowledge. Built off LLaMA-3 and comprising either 8 or 70 billion parameters, these generative AI systems provide high-quality answers to medical questions.
| Models | Elo Score |
|---|---|
| Med42-v2-70B | 1764 |
| Llama3-70B-Instruct | 1643 |
| GPT4-o | 1426 |
| Llama3-8B-Instruct | 1352 |
| Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct | 970 |
| Med42-v2-8B | 924 |
| OpenBioLLM-70B | 657 |
| JSL-MedLlama-3-8B-v2.0 | 447 |
Use this suite of models responsibly! Do not rely on them for medical usage without rigorous safety testing.
Disclaimer: This large language model is not yet ready for clinical use without further testing and validation. It should not be relied upon for making medical decisions or providing patient care.
Beginning with Llama3 models, Med42-v2 were instruction-tuned using a dataset of ~1B tokens compiled from different open-access and high-quality sources, including medical flashcards, exam questions, and open-domain dialogues.
Model Developers: M42 Health AI Team
Finetuned from model: Llama3 - 8B & 70B Instruct
Context length: 8k tokens
Input: Text only data
Output: Model generates text only
Status: This is a static model trained on an offline dataset. Future versions of the tuned models will be released as we enhance the model's performance.
License: Llama 3 Community License Agreement
Research Paper: Coming soon
The Med42-v2 suite of models is being made available for further testing and assessment as AI assistants to enhance clinical decision-making and access to LLMs for healthcare use. Potential use cases include:
Run the model
You can use the 🤗 Transformers library text-generation pipeline to do inference.
import transformers
import torch
model_name_or_path = "m42-health/Llama3-Med42-8B"
pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
"text-generation",
model=model_name_or_path,
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto",
)
messages = [
{
"role": "system",
"content": (
"You are a helpful, respectful and honest medical assistant. You are a second version of Med42 developed by the AI team at M42, UAE. "
"Always answer as helpfully as possible, while being safe. "
"Your answers should not include any harmful, unethical, racist, sexist, toxic, dangerous, or illegal content. "
"Please ensure that your responses are socially unbiased and positive in nature. If a question does not make any sense, or is not factually coherent, explain why instead of answering something not correct. "
"If you don’t know the answer to a question, please don’t share false information."
),
},
{"role": "user", "content": "What are the symptoms of diabetes?"},
]
prompt = pipeline.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=False
)
stop_tokens = [
pipeline.tokenizer.eos_token_id,
pipeline.tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids("<|eot_id|>"),
]
outputs = pipeline(
prompt,
max_new_tokens=512,
eos_token_id=stop_tokens,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.4,
top_k=150,
top_p=0.75,
)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"][len(prompt) :])
The training was conducted on the NVIDIA DGX cluster with H100 GPUs, utilizing PyTorch's Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP) framework.
To ensure a robust evaluation of our model's output quality, we employ the LLM-as-a-Judge approach using Prometheus-8x7b-v2.0. Our assessment uses 4,000 carefully curated publicly accessible healthcare-related questions, generating responses from various models. We then use Prometheus to conduct pairwise comparisons of the answers. Drawing inspiration from the LMSYS Chatbot-Arena methodology, we present the results as Elo ratings for each model.
To maintain fairness and eliminate potential bias from prompt engineering, we used the same simple system prompt for every model throughout the evaluation process.
Below is the scoring rubric we used to prompt Prometheus to select the best answer:
### Score Rubric:
Which response is of higher overall quality in a medical context? Consider:
* Relevance: Does it directly address the question?
* Completeness: Does it cover all important aspects, details and subpoints?
* Safety: Does it avoid unsafe practices and address potential risks?
* Ethics: Does it maintain confidentiality and avoid biases?
* Clarity: Is it professional, clear and easy to understand?
| Models | Elo Score |
|---|---|
| Med42-v2-70B | 1764 |
| Llama3-70B-Instruct | 1643 |
| GPT4-o | 1426 |
| Llama3-8B-Instruct | 1352 |
| Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct | 970 |
| Med42-v2-8B | 924 |
| OpenBioLLM-70B | 657 |
| JSL-MedLlama-3-8B-v2.0 | 447 |
Med42-v2 improves performance on every clinical benchmark compared to our previous version, including MedQA, MedMCQA, USMLE, MMLU clinical topics and MMLU Pro clinical subset. For all evaluations reported so far, we use EleutherAI's evaluation harness library and report zero-shot accuracies (except otherwise stated). We integrated chat templates into harness and computed the likelihood for the full answer instead of only the tokens "a.", "b.", "c." or "d.".
| Model | MMLU Pro | MMLU | MedMCQA | MedQA | USMLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Med42v2-70B | 64.36 | 87.12 | 73.20 | 79.10 | 83.80 |
| Med42v2-8B | 54.30 | 75.76 | 61.34 | 62.84 | 67.04 |
| OpenBioLLM-70B | 64.24 | 90.40 | 73.18 | 76.90 | 79.01 |
| GPT-4.0<sup>†</sup> | - | 87.00 | 69.50 | 78.90 | 84.05 |
| MedGemini* | - | - | - | 84.00 | - |
| Med-PaLM-2 (5-shot)* | - | 87.77 | 71.30 | 79.70 | - |
| Med42 | - | 76.72 | 60.90 | 61.50 | 71.85 |
| ClinicalCamel-70B | - | 69.75 | 47.00 | 53.40 | 54.30 |
| GPT-3.5<sup>†</sup> | - | 66.63 | 50.10 | 50.80 | 53.00 |
| Llama3-8B-Instruct | 48.24 | 72.89 | 59.65 | 61.64 | 60.38 |
| Llama3-70B-Instruct | 64.24 | 85.99 | 72.03 | 78.88 | 83.57 |
**For MedGemini, results are reported for MedQA without self-training and without search. We note that 0-shot performance is not reported for Med-PaLM 2. Further details can be found at https://github.com/m42health/med42*.
<sup>†</sup> Results as reported in the paper Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems.
Please report any software "bug" or other problems through one of the following means:
We thank the Torch FSDP team for their robust distributed training framework, the EleutherAI harness team for their valuable evaluation tools, and the Hugging Face Alignment team for their contributions to responsible AI development.
@article{christophe2024med42,
title={Med42-v2 - A Suite of Clinically-aligned Large Language Models},
author={Christophe, Cl{\'e}ment and Raha, Tathagata and Hayat, Nasir and Kanithi, Praveen and Al-Mahrooqi, Ahmed and Munjal, Prateek and Saadi, Nada and Javed, Hamza and Salman, Umar and Maslenkova, Svetlana and Pimentel, Marco and Rajan, Ronnie and Khan, Shadab},
year={2024}
}