Downloads · 30 days
0
Psycodem/gemma-4-e4b-lora-diacritization
gemma-4-e4b-lora-diacritization is a text generation model from Psycodem. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for peft. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
LoRA adapters that restore Arabic diacritics (tashkeel) on top of google/gemma-4-E4B-it. Three adapters are included, trained on 10%, 30% and 50% of the corpus, so the effect of training data volume can be read directly.
Downloads · 30 days
0
Access
Public
Updated Aug 23, 2026
Repo size
451 MB
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors419 MB · 81%
From the Hugging Face model README
LoRA adapters that restore Arabic diacritics (tashkeel) on top of
google/gemma-4-E4B-it. Three adapters are
included, trained on 10%, 30% and 50% of the corpus, so the effect of training
data volume can be read directly.
Part of DiacriticS, a contamination-controlled study of open-weights models on this task — project site · code.
Each fraction is a subfolder of this repo. 50pct is the strongest.
| Subfolder | Training rows | DER (CE) | DER (no CE) | WER (CE) | WER (no CE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10pct | 104,270 | 3.15 | 2.68 | 7.28 | 4.47 |
30pct | 312,809 | 2.98 | 2.54 | 6.82 | 4.12 |
50pct | 521,349 | 2.81 | 2.38 | 6.54 | 3.96 |
Scored on the full 1,200-paragraph SadeedDiac-25 benchmark with
Evaluation_Functions_Corrected.py.
Percentages; lower is better. CE = sentence-final case ending (i'rab).
DER / WER with case endings.
| Subfolder | Train sample (500) | Tashkeela test (2,485) | SadeedDiac-25 (1,200) |
|---|---|---|---|
10pct | 1.23 / 3.24 | 12.96 / 16.2 | 3.15 / 7.28 |
30pct | 1.81 / 3.54 | 12.73 / 15.73 | 2.98 / 6.82 |
50pct | 1.76 / 3.19 | 12.57 / 15.41 | 2.81 / 6.54 |
The Tashkeela test split scores worse than the benchmark because it inherits the residual annotation noise of the source corpus, not because the model does worse on it. SadeedDiac-25 is expert-reviewed and balanced 50/50 between Modern Standard and Classical Arabic.
</details>import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
from peft import PeftModel
BASE = "google/gemma-4-E4B-it"
ADAPTER = "Psycodem/gemma-4-e4b-lora-diacritization"
FRACTION = "50pct" # "10pct" | "30pct" | "50pct"
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(BASE, trust_remote_code=True)
if tok.pad_token is None:
tok.pad_token = tok.eos_token
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
BASE, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto", trust_remote_code=True)
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, ADAPTER, subfolder=FRACTION)
model = model.merge_and_unload()
model.eval()
SYSTEM_PROMPT = (
"أنت نظام متخصص في التشكيل الآلي للنصوص العربية. "
"مهمتك إضافة الحركات (التشكيل) الصحيحة إلى النص العربي المُدخل دون تغيير الكلمات أو ترتيبها، "
"مع مراعاة السياق النحوي والصرفي الكامل للجملة."
)
def diacritize(text):
msgs = [{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{"role": "user", "content": text}]
try:
prompt = tok.apply_chat_template(msgs, tokenize=False,
add_generation_prompt=True, enable_thinking=False)
except TypeError:
prompt = tok.apply_chat_template(msgs, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
enc = tok(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
with torch.no_grad():
out = model.generate(**enc, max_new_tokens=512, do_sample=False,
pad_token_id=tok.pad_token_id)
return tok.decode(out[0, enc["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True).strip()
print(diacritize("ذهب الطالب إلى المدرسة"))
The prompt must match the one above — it is what the adapter was trained
against, and a different instruction degrades output in ways that look like a bad
model rather than a harness mistake. Decode greedily (do_sample=False); the
reported numbers assume it. If you batch, set tok.padding_side = "left".
Trained on nested subsets of
Misraj/Sadeed_Tashkeela,
drawn with a fixed shuffle seed so the 10% subset is contained in the 30%, and
that in the 50%. The corpus has a measured 0.4% overlap with the benchmark, which
is what makes the benchmark number meaningful.
| Method | LoRA, base weights frozen in bf16 (not QLoRA) |
| Rank / alpha / dropout | 16 / 32 / 0.05 |
| Target modules | q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj |
| Adapted matrices | 258 |
| Effective batch | 96 (4 x 8 x 3 GPUs) |
| Learning rate | 2e-4, cosine |
| Warmup | 5% of total steps |
| Epochs | 1 |
| Max sequence length | 1024 |
| Seed | 42 |
| Hardware | 3× A100 80GB, DDP via torchrun |
Both base models in the study share this configuration exactly, so differences between them reflect architecture and data volume rather than tuning. The warmup ratio of every run was verified after the fact from its logged learning-rate curve.
Sentence-final case endings (i'rab) and Classical Arabic remain the dominant error sources, as they are for every system in the study. These adapters were trained for one epoch on a subset of a single corpus and are not expected to transfer to dialectal Arabic or to Quranic orthography with its additional annotation marks.
If you use these adapters, please cite the benchmark and corpus they build on:
@article{sadeed2025,
title = {Sadeed: Advancing Arabic Diacritization Through Small Language Model},
author = {Aldallal, Z. and Chrouf, S. and Hennara, K. and Hamed, M. M. and
Hreden, M. and AlModhayan, S.},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21635},
year = {2025}
}