Downloads · 30 days
6
11% of all-time downloads
Netta1994/setfit_baai_cybereason_gpt-4o_improved-cot-instructions_chat_few_shot_generated_only_
setfit_baai_cybereason_gpt-4o_improved-cot-instructions_chat_few_shot_generated_only_ is a text classification model from Netta1994. Use it when you need a label for a piece of text. It is set up for setfit.
This is a SetFit model that can be used for Text Classification. This SetFit model uses BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 as the Sentence Transformer embedding model. A LogisticRegression instance is used for classification.
Downloads · 30 days
6
11% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
56
Public
Parameters
109M
876 MB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors438 MB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This is a SetFit model that can be used for Text Classification. This SetFit model uses BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 as the Sentence Transformer embedding model. A LogisticRegression instance is used for classification.
The model has been trained using an efficient few-shot learning technique that involves:
| Label | Examples |
|---|---|
| 0 | <ul><li>'Reasoning:\nThe answer "It provides a comprehensive understanding of the situation" is overly general and lacks specifics directly drawn from the provided document. According to the document, considering all the answers together allows one to determine if the behavior is malicious and requires further remediation. Specifically, it discusses evaluating the significance of the machines, behaviors, and users involved to prioritize actions and determine the severity of the threat. The answer fails to incorporate these detailed aspects, making it too broad and inadequately grounded in the document.\n\nFinal evaluation: Bad'</li><li>"Reasoning:\nThe provided answer states that the information doesn't cover the specific query without attempting to derive an answer from the provided document. However, the document clearly outlines the process to exclude a MalOp during the remediation phase. It includes navigating to the appropriate sections of the <ORGANIZATION> platform and following specific steps to exclude the MalOp. The answer fails to capture this information and does not directly address the question with details available in the document.\n\nEvaluation: Bad"</li><li>'Reasoning:\nThe answer "If a file is quarantined, it should be un-quarantined before submitting it to <ORGANIZATION_3> <ORGANIZATION_2>." accurately reflects the information provided in the document. The document explicitly mentions that, as a pre-requisite, if a file is quarantined, it should be un-quarantined before submitting it to <ORGANIZATION_3> <ORGANIZATION_2>. The answer is concise, directly relevant to the question, and well-supported by the document.\n\nFinal evaluation: \nGood'</li></ul> |
| 1 | <ul><li>'Reasoning:\nThe answer "The computer will generate a dump file containing the entire contents of the sensor's RAM at the time of the failure" is accurate, well-supported by the document, and directly related to the question. The document clearly states in the "Result" section that "The computer will now generate a dump file in the event of a system failure, containing the entire contents of the sensor's RAM at the time of the failure." The answer is concise, relevant, and specific to the question asked, without providing unnecessary information or deviating from the context.\n\nFinal evaluation: Good'</li><li>'Reasoning:\nThe provided document states that the purpose of the <ORGANIZATION_2> platform's threat detection abilities is to "identify cyber security threats" by using the <ORGANIZATION> Engine to analyze data collected from various sources, leveraging artificial intelligence, machine learning, and behavioral analysis. The answer given, "To identify cyber security threats," is well-supported by the document and directly addresses the question without deviating into unrelated topics. It is concise, specific, and directly relevant to the question asked.\n\nEvaluation: Good'</li><li>"Reasoning:\nThe answer given states that the information provided doesn't cover the specific query and suggests referring to additional sources. However, the document clearly lists four scenarios with their associated severity scores, and there is no mention of a fifth scenario. The document does indeed only cover four scenarios, thereby making the user's response valid. The user answered in a way that acknowledges the limitation of provided information, which is accurate.\n\nEvaluation: Good"</li></ul> |
| Label | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| all | 0.5211 |
First install the SetFit library:
pip install setfit
Then you can load this model and run inference.
from setfit import SetFitModel
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SetFitModel.from_pretrained("Netta1994/setfit_baai_cybereason_gpt-4o_improved-cot-instructions_chat_few_shot_generated_only_")
# Run inference
preds = model("Reasoning:
The provided document clearly outlines the purpose of the <ORGANIZATION> XDR On-Site Collector Agent: it is installed to collect logs from platforms and securely forward them to <ORGANIZATION> XDR. The answer given aligns accurately with the document's description, addressing the specific question without deviating into unrelated topics. The response is also concise and to the point.
Evaluation: Good
")
<!--
### Downstream Use
*List how someone could finetune this model on their own dataset.*
-->
<!--
### Out-of-Scope Use
*List how the model may foreseeably be misused and address what users ought not to do with the model.*
-->
<!--
## Bias, Risks and Limitations
*What are the known or foreseeable issues stemming from this model? You could also flag here known failure cases or weaknesses of the model.*
-->
<!--
### Recommendations
*What are recommendations with respect to the foreseeable issues? For example, filtering explicit content.*
-->
| Training set | Min | Median | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Word count | 40 | 74.3043 | 119 |
| Label | Training Sample Count |
|---|---|
| 0 | 34 |
| 1 | 35 |
| Epoch | Step | Training Loss | Validation Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0058 | 1 | 0.2291 | - |
| 0.2890 | 50 | 0.2565 | - |
| 0.5780 | 100 | 0.2405 | - |
| 0.8671 | 150 | 0.1052 | - |
| 1.1561 | 200 | 0.0039 | - |
| 1.4451 | 250 | 0.0022 | - |
| 1.7341 | 300 | 0.002 | - |
| 2.0231 | 350 | 0.0017 | - |
| 2.3121 | 400 | 0.0017 | - |
| 2.6012 | 450 | 0.0015 | - |
| 2.8902 | 500 | 0.0013 | - |
| 3.1792 | 550 | 0.0013 | - |
| 3.4682 | 600 | 0.0013 | - |
| 3.7572 | 650 | 0.0013 | - |
| 4.0462 | 700 | 0.0013 | - |
| 4.3353 | 750 | 0.0012 | - |
| 4.6243 | 800 | 0.0012 | - |
| 4.9133 | 850 | 0.0012 | - |
@article{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.11055,
doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2209.11055},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11055},
author = {Tunstall, Lewis and Reimers, Nils and Jo, Unso Eun Seo and Bates, Luke and Korat, Daniel and Wasserblat, Moshe and Pereg, Oren},
keywords = {Computation and Language (cs.CL), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
title = {Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts},
publisher = {arXiv},
year = {2022},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}
<!--
## Glossary
*Clearly define terms in order to be accessible across audiences.*
-->
<!--
## Model Card Authors
*Lists the people who create the model card, providing recognition and accountability for the detailed work that goes into its construction.*
-->
<!--
## Model Card Contact
*Provides a way for people who have updates to the Model Card, suggestions, or questions, to contact the Model Card authors.*
-->