Downloads · 30 days
5
2% of all-time downloads
LoneStriker/Smaug-72B-v0.1-2.4bpw-h6-exl2
Smaug-72B-v0.1-2.4bpw-h6-exl2 is a text generation model from LoneStriker. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as other.
Downloads · 30 days
5
2% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
254
Public
Repo size
24.4 GB
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors24.4 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README


Smaug arrives!
We recently released Smaug-72B-v0.1 which has taken first place on the Open LLM Leaderboard by HuggingFace. It is the first open-source model to have an average score more than 80.
Smaug-72B is finetuned directly from moreh/MoMo-72B-lora-1.8.7-DPO and is ultimately based on Qwen-72B.
To do so we built on techniques and datasets used in our previous model efforts, with the addition of some new datasets and a new approach. We believe this new approach is generally useful in training across a wide range of model types and downstream use cases, and it powers both our Smaug-34B and 72B models.
We are currently working on writing up this new technique in the form of a technical report which we aim to release on arXiv soon (we may also be releasing a new member of the Smaug lineup at that time!). We are excited to release the details to the open source community for them to build on and improve Smaug and spawn more dragons to dominate the LLM space. Keep watching this space for our announcements!
| Average | ARC | HellaSwag | MMLU | TruthfulQA | Winogrande | GSM8K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.48 | 76.02 | 89.27 | 77.15 | 76.67 | 85.08 | 78.70 |
We ran MT-Bench with the llama-2 conversation template and the system prompt set to the Qwen system prompt. We got the following results in single model mode:
| First Turn | Second Turn | Average |
|---|---|---|
| 8.18 | 7.34 | 7.76 |
The bottom of the card includes some sample responses from the model. We have selected responses that have high and low scores from the GPT-4 judge.
We generate our contamination numbers using https://github.com/swj0419/detect-pretrain-code-contamination/tree/master, with Llama7B as our reference model. Smaug-72B has the following results:
| ARC | TruthfulQA | GSM8K |
|---|---|---|
| 0.20 | 0.45 | 1.00 |
By comparison, MoMo-72B-lora-1.8.7-DPO has the following results:
| ARC | TruthfulQA | GSM8K |
|---|---|---|
| 0.20 | 0.39 | 1.00 |
Note that GSM8K often scores very highly on this contamination suite - we verified this by also running Llama-2-70B:
| ARC | TruthfulQA | GSM8K |
|---|---|---|
| 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.89 |
Question
Imagine you are writing a blog post comparing two popular smartphone models. Develop an outline for the blog post, including key points and subheadings to effectively compare and contrast the features, performance, and user experience of the two models. Please answer in fewer than 200 words.
Response
Outline:
Question
In a survey conducted at a local high school, preferences for a new school color were measured: 58% of students liked the color blue, 45% preferred green, and 22% liked both colors. If we randomly pick a student from the school, what's the probability that they would like neither blue nor green?
Answer
To find the probability that a randomly picked student would like neither blue nor green, we need to find the percentage of students who like only one color or neither color.
From the given information, we know:
To find the percentage of students who like only one color, we can subtract the percentage of students who like both colors from the sum of students who like blue and green:
Now, to find the probability of a student liking neither blue nor green, we subtract the percentage of students who like at least one color from 100%:
So, the probability that a randomly picked student would like neither blue nor green is 17%.
Question
Implement a program to find the common elements in two arrays without using any extra data structures.
Answer
Finding common elements in two arrays without using extra data structures can be achieved by using a simple algorithm. Here's a Python implementation of this problem:
def find_common_elements(arr1, arr2):
common_elements = []
for num1 in arr1:
if num1 in arr2 and num1 not in common_elements:
common_elements.append(num1)
return common_elements
# Example usage:
array1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
array2 = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
print(find_common_elements(array1, array2)) # Output: [4, 5]
This program iterates through the elements of the first array (arr1) and checks if each element is present in the second array (arr2). If it is, and the element hasn't been added to the common_elements list yet, it is appended. The function then returns the list of common elements.
Question
Identify the named entities (people, organizations, locations) mentioned in the given news article. Please generate a JSON dictionary that lists the named entities in three separate groups based on their entity types. The key is the type of entity and the value is a list of strings.
Yesterday, Adamson Emerson, the CEO of Faraday, and Dieter Zetsche, the CEO of Daimler AG, announced plans to build a new Gigafactory in Berlin. The facility will be a joint venture between Faraday and Daimler, producing electric vehicles and battery packs for both companies, creating thousands of job opportunities in the region. Emerson and Zetsche stated that the strategic location of Berlin, coupled with its skilled workforce and strong infrastructure, makes it an ideal choice for expansion. The new Gigafactory aims to meet the growing demand for electric vehicles in Europe and contribute to a sustainable future. Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess welcomed the news, saying greater collaboration will, benefit the auto industry's transition to e-mobility.
Answer
{
"people": ["Adamson Emerson", "Dieter Zetsche", "Herbert Diess"],
"organizations": ["Faraday", "Daimler AG", "Volkswagen"],
"locations": ["Berlin", "Europe"]
}