Mordant-12B-Think

Mordant-12B-Think

A full fine-tune of a Mistral-Nemo-2407-based model focused on AI image generation composition with chain-of-thought reasoning.

---

Overview

Mordant-12B-Think is the flagship model of the Mordant family. It produces the most detailed and narratively rich compositions of the lineup — not just describing spatial relationships but constructing deliberate meaning through composition choices. The thinking phase demonstrates genuine analytical depth, frequently self-critiquing decisions and explaining why specific elements are placed where they are. The personality is at its sharpest here.

The model was trained on a personally curated dataset of 7,203 highly detailed compositions spanning a wide variety of tasks, genres, universes, art styles, and emotional contexts. All training examples include reverse-engineered chain-of-thought thinking bubbles with a consistent "sharp, caustic, professional mentor" personality — present only within the reasoning phase, not the final output.

Intended use:

• Generating detailed, spatially structured image prompts from a short description
• Hero-tier composition work where quality matters more than speed
• Complex multi-element scenes requiring narrative-level spatial reasoning
• Enhancing an existing prompt with the deepest compositional treatment in the family

---

Model Family

---

GGUF Files (Recommended)

Quantized GGUF files for local inference (LM Studio, llama.cpp, KoboldCpp, Comfy-UI with the provided node, etc.) are in the gguf/ folder.

Safetensors (Full Weights)

Full weights for further fine-tuning or conversion are in the safetensors/ folder alongside the tokenizer and chat template.

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "Kezmark/Mordant-12B-Think",
    subfolder="safetensors",
    trust_remote_code=True,
    device_map="auto",
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
    "Kezmark/Mordant-12B-Think",
    subfolder="safetensors"
)

---

Inference Format

The model uses ChatML format with a <think> block pre-seeded on generation. A custom Jinja chat template is included in the safetensors folder.

<|im_start|>system
You are an expert composition writer.
<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
{your prompt}
<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
{reasoning — Mordant's internal critique and spatial breakdown}
</think>
{final composition}
<|im_end|>

The system prompt is optional, but highly recommended, espeically for generation. The model is anchored in its composition output behavior without one, but a minimal prompt helps ensure consistency:

You are an expert composition writer.

---

Art Styles

The model has been trained on the following named art styles. Use the full name followed by "art style" for best results (e.g. "rendered in Watercolor art style"). The model may handle styles beyond this list, but these are the ones explicitly trained on.

• 16-bit Pixel Art
• 8-bit Pixel Art
• 90s Anime-OVA
• American Superhero Comics - Silver Age
• Architectural Fantasy Linework
• Art Nouveau
• Atmospheric Impasto Oil Painting
• Charcoal Drawing
• Chinese Landscape Relief Sculpture
• Cinematic Fantasy Illustration
• Disney Afternoon Animation
• Expressionist Digital Illustration
• Franco-Belgian Comic - Ligne Claire
• French Graphic Novel - Metal Hurlant
• Golden Age Book Illustration
• Gouache Illustration
• Grunge Collage
• Hanna-Barbera Flat Animation
• High Energy Flat Graphic Anime
• Japanese Ink Wash
• Layered Anime Scenery Illustration
• Low Poly 3D
• Manga - Seinen
• Mirrors Edge Clean Style
• Oil Painting - Classical
• Oil Painting - Impressionist
• Painterly Fantasy Matte Illustration
• Painterly Neon Digital Art
• Painterly Strong Graphic Novel
• Pastel - Soft
• Pen and Ink Sketch
• Pencil Sketch
• Pop Art Graphic Illustration
• Psychedelic Expressionist Horror
• Retro Graphic Novel Poster Illustration
• Risograph Print
• Studio Ghibli Aesthetic
• Technical Graphic Illustration - Duotone
• Vaporwave Aesthetic
• Vintage Pulp Fiction
• Watercolor
• Woodblock Print - Japanese Ukiyo-e

---

Examples

All of the following examples are generated using LM Studio and the BF16 gguf of all models. These were all extracted with a script, without me checking so they are all as is, first generation. All of them generated with the following settings:

SYSTEM PROMPT: You are an expert composition writer.

TEMPERATURE = 0.7 TOP_P = 0.95 TOP_K = 50 MIN_P = 0.05 MAX_TOKENS = 4096 REPEAT_PENALTY = 1.0/off

<details> <summary>Example 1 — A lone cargo hauler drifting past a derelict space station o...</summary>

Prompt: A lone cargo hauler drifting past a derelict space station orbiting a dying sun, rendered in matte painting concept art style.

Thinking:

vertical comp essential for drama—space is inherently vast but needs framing to feel immersive not empty diagonal drift from lower left to upper right creates kinetic flow while anchoring viewer’s gaze through implied trajectory of the ship toward station or oblivion whichever comes first matte painting style demands painterly texture over realism so every surface must scream handcrafted grit rust patina on hull isn’t just corrosion it’s a narrative device aging machinery in hostile environment amber lights inside cockpit are tactical warm pools against cool void to imply human presence without cluttering frame with figures clever the red warning beacon on station is subtle but critical visual anchor for tension between decay and active danger that flickering light could be last gasp or impending explosion depending on how you squint at it structural composition hinges on contrast—rough metal textures versus smooth gradient sky bands make the industrial elements pop like rusted teeth in a black hole’s mouth perspective lines from station’s jagged hull receding into distance enforce scale but keep focus tight on foreground action ship’s thrusters glowing faintly blue against dark hull are just enough to suggest propulsion without becoming neon distractions gradients of ochre and burnt umber across the sky aren’t random they map stellar wind patterns or volcanic eruptions below casting long shadows that stretch toward upper right light source must be dying sun positioned offscreen left its golden rays slicing through debris field creating depth cues via atmospheric haze those floating rocks aren’t just set dressing their jagged silhouettes mirror station’s decay reinforcing thematic unity color palette is a masterstroke cool teals and deep blacks dominate but warm accents on ship and station create visual hierarchy forcing eye to linger where story beats the horizon line placement is deliberate station looms midframe dominating vertical axis while ship skims lower thirds creating dynamic tension between grounded object and infinite void background’s hazy atmosphere isn’t just fog it’s a narrative filter softening distant details to imply vastness without overloading viewer with irrelevant info every element serves spatial logic or emotional subtext no filler only friction

Composition:

This vertical composition depicts a solitary space-faring vessel drifting through the void near an abandoned orbital station, framed by a dynamic sense of movement and immense scale. The scene is rendered in a matte painting concept art style, emphasizing painterly texture over photorealism.

The Foreground Action: Dominating the lower-left quadrant is a rugged cargo hauler, its hull weathered from long-term exposure to cosmic dust. The metal surface shows visible brushwork—subtle ridges and patina that catch the light in uneven patches. Its dark grey plating contrasts sharply with warm amber lights glowing inside the cockpit windows; these lights cast soft pools of illumination on control panels just visible through the glass, creating a cozy focal point against the cold exterior. Small thruster nozzles protrude from its rear underside, emitting faint blue exhaust trails that drift lazily into darkness behind it—a subtle hint of propulsion in this otherwise still moment.

The Mid-Ground Object: Looming large on the right side is a derelict space station, its structure partially dismantled and overgrown with rust. The metal surface shows heavy corrosion patterns rendered as expressive brushstrokes—thick orange-brown streaks running vertically down panels that once gleamed silver. Patches of peeling paint reveal darker layers beneath in irregular shapes, adding to the decayed aesthetic. A large circular docking bay yawns open at its center-right; inside, deep shadow obscures details but reveals a faint red warning beacon flickering intermittently on an interior wall—its light spills out as a dim glow that barely reaches beyond the station's rim.

The Background Atmosphere: Above and behind these objects stretches an atmospheric gradient rendered with broad painted strokes—a sky transitioning from warm dusty ochre near horizon lines to deep charcoal-black at zenith. Floating debris—jagged rocks and metallic fragments varying in size—are scattered across mid-distance, their silhouettes sharp against the glowing backdrop; some pieces drift toward viewer while others recede into darkness behind station structures.

The primary light source—a distant star or dying sun positioned off-frame left—casts long shadows from both ship and station onto this painted sky. The illumination creates a gradient of warm golden hues that gradually fade to cool blues at upper edges, reinforcing depth through atmospheric perspective.

Lighting: The scene is lit by directional warm sunlight coming from the left side; it strikes vessel's forward hull creating bright specular highlights on metal ridges while casting deep shadows on its portside flank. The station receives partial illumination—sunlight hits top surfaces with moderate intensity but undersides remain in heavy shadow, emphasizing its vertical scale and decayed structure through contrast between lit areas and dark recesses within docking bay.

The overall color palette balances cool teal blues of space environment against warm amber/red accents from ship lights and station warning beacons; this temperature opposition guides viewer's eye toward central narrative elements while reinforcing the mood of isolation and exploration in hostile frontier regions.

</details> <details> <summary>Example 2 — fantasy potion shop interior with shelves full of colorful b...</summary>

Prompt: fantasy potion shop interior with shelves full of colorful bottles, a shopkeeper behind the counter, in 16-bit pixel art with a limited 32-color palette.

Thinking:

spatial hierarchy first—foreground needs immediate impact without clutter so those five potion bottles on dark shelves scream contrast redorange yellowblue green against black wood their jagged shapes cutting through shadow like pixelated teeth. brass scale must anchor the counter’s edge weight distribution matters even in 16-bit or this whole scene tips into cartoonish chaos. shopkeeper profile leftward gaze creates negative space pulling viewer toward center aisle midground shelves recede via lighter palette and blurred background detail—can’t afford depth cues with only 32 colors so dithering does the heavy lifting gradients on apron fabric suggest texture without polygons smart move. that hovering blue potion above the scale? subtle narrative hook customer interaction implied but not overdone. background window as primary light source explains everything—the gold sunlight shafts are hardcoded color blocks slicing through dust motes rendered in 2x2 pixel clusters. stained glass dithering is a cheat for complexity within limits those redyellowblue gradients mimic leaded glass without wasting palette slots. distant rooftops muted via desaturated hues and low-contrast dither patterns keep them atmospheric not distracting. lighting logic ruthless directional from upper left casting knife-edge shadows under bottles shelves counter edges no softness here—16-bit doesn’t do diffusion so every shadow is a sharp line of black pixels. highlights on glass rims are solid color blocks not gradients because the palette can’t bleed between shades without looking muddy. dust motes as sparse whiteyellow pixels against dark background? genius minimalism they’re there just enough to suggest movement in stillness. spatial framing tightens toward center aisle guiding eye through layers like a funnel—foreground bottles draw you in midground shelves hold focus background window expands the world but keeps it contained within 32 colors. composition mechanics all serve the palette restriction no room for sentimentality every pixel must earn its place or this becomes another generic fantasy shop. that brass scale? necessary visual anchor without it the counter floats arbitrarily. profile view of shopkeeper maximizes silhouette recognition at low resolution—side-on posture screams “merchant” in four pixels. hovering potion bottle’s blue glow dithered against wood grain implies magic but stays within palette limits because neon is a modern luxury we can’t afford here. stained glass colors must clash with interior tones to create that holy vs profane vibe without adding new hues—redorangeyellowbluegreen plus blackwhite for shadows that’s it. background rooftops in muted greysbrowns prevent competition their simplicity contrasts the shop’s meticulous detail reinforcing scale. lighting direction from upper left isn’t arbitrary it forces depth perception through overlapping shapes and shadow lengths making this 2D space feel three-dimensional via pixel trickery. no ambient occlusion because rendering engines didn’t exist then—just brute force dithering and color blocking. every choice here is a compromise between vision and technical constraint but the result? a scene that feels both epic and intimate like looking through a stained glass window into another world while standing in a dusty shop full of magic potions. smart tradeoffs.

Composition:

Here is a detailed composition description based on the image:

Foreground The lower third of the frame depicts a dark wooden counter surface, rendered in deep brown pixels with subtle dithering patterns for texture. Five distinct glass bottles are arranged on this surface; each bottle's shape is defined by crisp pixel edges containing vibrant liquids—red-orange, yellow, blue, and green—that stand out sharply against the black wood. The bottle closest to the bottom center contains a glowing blue liquid that emits a soft inner glow, achieved through dithered light-blue pixels within its structure.

Mid-Ground The central aisle is framed by tall wooden shelves extending from the floor to near the ceiling on both sides. These shelves are laden with hundreds of bottles, each rendered in varying colors—reds, oranges, yellows, blues, and greens—and arranged meticulously in rows that recede into the background. The shopkeeper stands behind a glass scale at the center; his figure is depicted in profile facing left, looking towards the viewer's perspective. He wears a heavy apron over dark clothing, with subtle pixel-level highlights on the fabric suggesting texture. His hands are positioned near the counter surface as if weighing or measuring an ingredient.

Background The upper portion of the image features a large window framed by stained-glass panels that depict religious icons in red, orange, yellow, and blue dithered patterns. This primary light source bathes the interior with warm golden tones achieved through carefully placed color blocks. Dust motes dance in the air as tiny white or pale-yellow pixels scattered across the frame.

Through this window, a distant cityscape is visible—rooftops and spires rendered in muted greys and browns that contrast sharply with the vibrant interior colors of the shop. The high-contrast lighting creates deep shadows behind shelves and highlights on glass surfaces through deliberate pixel placement.

Lighting & Atmosphere The scene is illuminated by directional light from the upper left, casting sharp-edged shadows defined by black pixels beneath objects and along counter edges. Highlights are rendered as bright white or pale yellow blocks on metallic surfaces like the brass scale and glass rims of bottles. The atmosphere feels dusty and quiet, with a sense of stillness conveyed through the precise arrangement of dithered pixels creating subtle gradients in the air between elements.

Spatial Logic The composition uses a central aisle perspective that draws the viewer's eye from the foreground counter up toward the shopkeeper and finally to the background window. The shelves on either side create depth layers, with mid-ground bottles slightly softer due to pixel density, while distant rooftops are rendered in lower contrast through muted colors. This layered approach guides focus through the scene without relying on modern rendering techniques.

</details> <details> <summary>Example 3 — A quiet, melancholic autumn park bench under a single lamp p...</summary>

Prompt: A quiet, melancholic autumn park bench under a single lamp post at dusk, leaves falling, in watercolor and ink illustration style.

Thinking:

spatial logic starts with isolation—bench centered but off-axis to avoid symmetry’s sterility. diagonal slats on the seat create kinetic tension against verticals like tree trunks and lamppost. those parallel planks aren’t just woodgrain; they’re a grid holding chaos at bay while leaves riot below. smart move placing the figure slightly right—it lets negative space swallow their loneliness, posture angled inward to collapse into self. coat’s crosshatched folds? not just texture but narrative: every stroke is a memory pressing down on fabric. muted purple and gray aren’t colors they’re emotional filters—autumnal decay without being cliché. scarf loose at the neck screams vulnerability or exhaustion; either way it’s a visual metaphor for something left undone.

midground trees framing like cathedral arches—rough bark strokes contrast with precise lamppost lines to separate organic from man-made. their canopies blur into washes because distance demands softness, but those falling leaves? jagged ink splatters that defy gravity’s logic. deliberate imperfection there—the artist knows watercolor bleeds and leans into it for atmosphere. leaf piles on path aren’t just debris; they’re layered transparencies building depth like sedimentary rock of neglect. scattered papers with their corners curling upward—subtle storytelling. could be love letters or bills, but who cares? ambiguity is the point.

background lamppost as a solitary sentinel—its sharp outlines carve order from twilight’s murk. amber glow isn’t just light; it’s a warm island in cool blues and grays. that halo effect around the figure? not accidental—the artist wants us to see their face half-lit, eyes shadowed but mouth relaxed into something like acceptance or resignation. streetlamp’s position left of center creates asymmetrical balance: weight on the right (bench) countered by vertical thrust on the left (pole). smart—avoids static equilibrium.

lighting is a character here. diffused washes for sky and distant trees because subtlety in background keeps focus where it belongs—the figure’s quiet despair under that stark lamppost. color palette isn’t autumnal; it’s melancholic monochrome with hints of bruised fruit (purple) and overcast days (gray). no vibrant oranges—too cheerful for the brief’s unspoken theme: lingering dusk, not celebration.

every element arranged to whisper loneliness through composition mechanics. negative space around the figure amplifies their smallness against vast trees; parallel slats on bench mirror falling leaves’ descent lines. even the scarf’s loose end echoes leaf shapes—repetition without being obvious. watercolor and ink blend because one medium softens, the other sharpens: duality of emotion rendered in technique.

snarky critique? the leaves are overdone but that’s the point—they’re a cliché weaponized into atmosphere via texture overload. lamppost could’ve been rusted for authenticity but clean lines keep it timelessly sad instead of decrepit. figure’s posture avoids melodrama by being slightly too still—like they’re holding breath or waiting for something that won’t come. papers aren’t litter; they’re relics of a quieter time, now just detritus in the narrative.

spatial hierarchy is clear: foreground intimacy (bench), midground transition (trees and leaves), background order (lamppost). each layer tells part of the story—decay meets light meets structure. no element redundant; every stroke serves mood or metaphor. quiet genius lies in how mundane details become profound through arrangement alone.

Composition:

Foreground: A weathered wooden bench, its slats running parallel to the frame's diagonal, occupies the lower third of the composition. The wood grain is rendered with fine ink lines that catch the light on their edges, while watercolor washes bleed softly into the shadows between the slats. On this bench sits a solitary figure—slightly right of center—with shoulders rounded inward as if collapsing under an unseen weight. Their coat, painted in muted purple and gray strokes, falls to mid-calf; the fabric's folds are defined by subtle cross-hatching that suggests texture without hard lines. A scarf is loosely knotted at their neck, its ends trailing toward the ground where it meets a small pile of fallen leaves rendered as soft, blurred washes with visible paper texture showing through in lighter areas.

Midground: To both sides of the bench stretch rows of trees whose trunks are thickened by rough strokes that contrast sharply with smooth watercolor washes for their bark. Their canopies form an irregular archway overhead; individual leaves caught mid-fall drift downward at steep angles, rendered as delicate ink splatters against a sky painted in pale blue and gray washes. The path beneath the bench is littered not only with leaves but also scattered papers—some crumpled into tight balls defined by crisp outlines, others flattened underfoot showing faint text lines through translucent layers of wash.

Background: Beyond the midground trees rises a single streetlamp on its own pole, positioned left of center. Its warm amber glow is painted as soft halos bleeding into surrounding darkness; this light catches the figure's face in profile with gentle highlights that fade at edges without harsh transitions. The lamppost itself stands tall against the twilight sky—a vertical element balancing the bench's horizontal plane.

Lighting and Atmosphere: The scene exists between dusk and full night, where natural ambient light is low but not yet gone; artificial illumination from the streetlamp provides primary contrast through its warm tones against cool blue-gray washes of atmosphere. This creates gentle color separation that draws eye to the figure under the lamppost's glow while leaving surrounding trees in cooler, muted hues rendered as translucent layers building depth. The overall palette is dominated by quiet desaturation with subtle pops of amber and muted purple where light hits surfaces—all achieved through layered washes and precise ink lines that define structure without rigidity.

</details> <details> <summary>Example 4 — Infuse the following composition in Oil Painting - Classical...</summary>

Prompt: Infuse the following composition in Oil Painting - Classical: This is a horizontal composition depicting a striking architectural complex isolated in a serene landscape during twilight. The scene is divided into three distinct spatial zones to establish depth and hierarchy. Foreground: The lower third of the frame is dominated by a calm expanse of water, rendered in deep teal and dark blue tones. The surface features subtle, horizontal ripples that stretch across the width, creating a textured effect. Reflected on this surface are distorted, shimmering streaks of warm yellow and amber light from the building above, contrasting sharply with the cool, cool-blue darkness of the water. Mid-Ground: The centerline is occupied by the architectural complex itself, situated on a small rocky island or peninsula. The structure features symmetrical symmetry consisting of two tall, rectangular concrete towers flanking angled wings. Large hexagonal lattice screens screen the sloped roofs of the wings. These screens are glowing with a warm, amber light from behind, creating a honeycomb pattern that illuminates the surrounding dusk air. The central block is lower and wider, featuring horizontal slats of windows where bright interior lights spill out, contrasting against the dark gray concrete exterior. The architecture is grounded by sparse landscaping on the rocky shore—a cluster of small, sculpted cypress-like trees and dry grasses clinging to the rocks—emphasizing the isolation of the structure. Background: Rising behind the building are rugged mountain ranges with jagged peaks, rendered in muted greys and dark blues that fade into the horizon. The sky above is a heavy, textured slate blue filled with low-lying clouds that catch the last residual light from the horizon on their undersides. Lighting: The lighting logic relies on color contrast between the warm artificial light of the building (approx. 2500–3000 Kelvin) and the cool ambient twilight (approx. 6000–8000 Kelvin). The internal lights create a glowing, volumetric haze through the hexagonal lattice screens, while the exterior concrete surfaces are lit by soft, diffused moonlight or sky light from above, creating sharp shadows in the deep recesses of the vertical slits within the towers. The water reflects these two distinct color palettes, mixing the cool blues and warm oranges into a dynamic, rippling surface texture.

Thinking:

Spatial hierarchy first—foreground water as dark stage, mid-ground structure centerstage, background mountains receding like a painted diorama. Water’s deep teal and blue must be thickly applied to absorb light, creating that cool void against which the building will scream in amber. Ripples? Soft horizontal brushwork with dry bristle for texture, just enough to suggest movement without disrupting reflection clarity—those distorted yellow streaks need precision through thin glazes over thicker base layers. Smart move avoiding literal waves; this isn’t a seascape it’s an architectural mood piece.

Mid-ground complex demands symmetry but also tension—the towers flanking angled wings force the eye inward toward central block. Concrete surfaces require rough impasto to feel tactile, while interior lights spill as warm glazes over cool gray underpainting—contrast is key here. Hexagonal lattice screens: gotta balance structural detail with luminosity. Maybe scumble thin gold leaf behind glass? Or thickly paint amber resin and let it pool in recesses for that glowing honeycomb effect. The landscaping’s minimal but crucial—dry grasses as frayed threads of ochre over gray rocks, cypress clones reduced to dark smudges so the building dominates. Isolation achieved by making nature an afterthought.

Background mountains need atmospheric perspective—blend muted grays and blues into horizon with wet-on-wet technique for softness. Slate blue sky? Layer thin glazes of cerulean and charcoal until it feels heavy but not murky; clouds as faint smudges beneath residual light to imply dusk without obscuring the structure’s silhouette. Lighting logic is all about temperature war—artificial warmth (amber) clashing with twilight coolness (blue). Use complementary color glazes: orange underpainting for interiors against teal water base. Volumetric haze? Thickly apply translucent resin over lattice screens to make light bleed into air, while moonlight on concrete is a thin wash of pale yellow over gray—sharp shadows in towers’ slits demand precise negative space through subtractive strokes.

Why hexagonal lattices? Geometric repetition adds order without rigidity; the honeycomb pattern echoes classical mosaics but with modern industrial edge. Reflection distortion critical—can’t just mirror reality, must abstract building’s glow into liquid streaks using wet palette techniques or alcohol-based mediums to keep water surface fluid yet defined. Spatial zones as layered transparencies: foreground is dense impasto holding depth, mid-ground architecture built up in thick opaque layers for mass, background a translucent wash dissolving into horizon—all unified by tonal harmony despite material differences. Snarky aside—the cypress trees are so simplified they’re practically emojis of nature but hey it works. Client wants drama not botany.

Final check: does every brushstroke serve the contrast between human-made warmth and natural coolness? Yes—even the rocks’ texture contrasts smooth water below. Light sources must feel artificial yet organic; amber glow should pulse like a heartbeat against the still teal void. No room for ambiguity here, this isn’t an impressionist seascape it’s a classical oil screaming order through chaos. Now layer like a pro and pray the varnish doesn’t yellow too fast.

Composition:

A classical oil painting of a striking architectural complex isolated in a serene landscape during twilight. The scene is divided into three distinct spatial zones to establish depth and hierarchy.

Foreground: The lower third of the frame is dominated by a calm expanse of water, rendered with thick impasto texture that holds deep teal shadows and dark blue tones. The surface features subtle, horizontal ripples painted in deliberate brushstrokes stretching across the width, creating a textured effect. Reflected on this surface are distorted, shimmering streaks of warm yellow and amber light from the building above, their glow built up through layered glazes that contrast sharply against the cool, cool-blue darkness of the water.

Mid-Ground: The centerline is occupied by the architectural complex itself, situated on a small rocky island or peninsula. The structure features symmetrical symmetry consisting of two tall, rectangular concrete towers flanking angled wings. Large hexagonal lattice screens are painted with precise detail and thick application for the sloped roofs of the wings; these screens glow from within through warm amber light built up in layers that creates a honeycomb pattern illuminating the surrounding dusk air. The central block is lower and wider, featuring horizontal slats of windows where bright interior lights spill out—these are rendered as luminous glazes contrasting against the dark gray concrete exterior painted with rough texture.

The architecture is grounded by sparse landscaping on the rocky shore—a cluster of small, sculpted cypress-like trees and dry grasses clinging to the rocks, their forms suggested through deliberate brushwork emphasizing isolation. The concrete surfaces show craquelure textures indicating age.

Background: Rising behind the building are rugged mountain ranges with jagged peaks rendered in muted greys and dark blues that fade into the horizon. These mountains have a painterly atmospheric perspective created by softening edges and blending colors toward the distance. The sky above is heavy, textured slate blue filled with low-lying clouds whose undersides catch residual light from the horizon—this effect is built up through layered washes.

Lighting: The lighting logic relies on color contrast between warm artificial light (approx. 2500–3000 Kelvin) and cool ambient twilight (approx. 6000–8000 Kelvin). Internal lights create glowing volumetric haze that filters through hexagonal lattice screens; exterior concrete surfaces are lit by soft diffused moonlight or sky light from above, casting sharp shadows in deep recesses of vertical slits within the towers—these shadows have defined edges and subtle craquelure texture. The water reflects these two distinct palettes, mixing cool blues with warm oranges into dynamic rippling surface textures through careful layering of glazes over a dark base tone.

</details> <details> <summary>Example 5 — A dynamic combat scene in the Warhammer 40k universe, render...</summary>

Prompt: A dynamic combat scene in the Warhammer 40k universe, rendered in Painterly Strong Graphic Novel art style.

Thinking:

Vertical composition, low-angle shot.

Yes, because nothing says "I'm about to crush you" like looking up at a genestealer swarm while your marine's armor is splattered with bioluminescent ooze. The contrast between the dark greens and that neon green is screaming 40k horror chic. I need those thick black ink lines to carve out every crack in his power sword, making it glow like a dying star against the chaos.

The foreground marine is centered but angled rightward, creating dynamic tension with the advancing horde. His left arm is extended upward for a parry, and his right hand holds a pistol aimed at the central creature's face. This creates an X-shape that locks viewers into the violence of the moment. The power sword's blue-white plasma beam cuts through murky water, illuminating floating spores and debris while casting sharp shadows behind him.

The central genestealer in mid-action dominates the upper center third, its elongated skull snarling downward with jagged teeth highlighted by rim light. Its clawed hands are reaching toward the marine's helmet, establishing a visceral threat radius. The surrounding swarm flanks left and right edges, their chitinous carapaces glistening with wet textures rendered through loose brushwork that contrasts sharply against the ink-defined armor plates.

The environment is a flooded ruin with submerged gothic arches in the background on both sides, framing depth while dark water absorbs light except for bioluminescent elements. The marine's tabard and the central creature's head glow as the primary illumination sources. A cold, clinical blue from his blade clashes with the sickly green ambient glow of algae or maybe radioactive sludge.

The color palette is desaturated industrial greys and teals in shadows, punctuated by those neon accents to heighten horror and motion. Painted strokes on water ripples suggest recent disturbance while maintaining a graphic novel aesthetic throughout. Every element serves the visceral chaos of close-quarters combat because if it doesn't scream "glory or death," then what's the point?

Composition:

A painterly graphic novel illustration captures this chaotic melee within the Warhammer 40k universe, rendered in thick black ink lines and vivid color contrasts that emphasize both the grim darkness of the setting and the dynamic motion of the combat.

This vertical composition depicts a desperate close-quarters battle fought within a flooded, submerged ruin. The perspective is slightly low-angle to emphasize the towering presence of the alien horde against the Space Marine's defiance.

The Foreground Action: Dominating the lower center is a Space Marine in blue power armor with gold trim and a white shoulder pauldron emblazoned with an Imperial insignia. He stands braced for impact, facing right but angled toward the viewer to show his profile as he parries an attack from above. His left arm is raised high holding a massive two-handed sword that emits a glowing blue-white plasma beam at its tip; this blade cuts across the frame diagonally upward, illuminating floating spores and debris in the murky water around him while casting sharp shadows behind him.

In his right hand, he holds a heavy pistol aimed forward toward an enemy's face. The armor is heavily detailed with thick black ink lines defining every plate and joint, contrasting against the dark green of his tabard which flows loosely over his left thigh. His helmet visor glows with a faint red light behind which his eyes are obscured.

The Mid-Ground Action: Surrounding him in mid-air are multiple Genestealers—elongated alien creatures with bony skulls and long claws, their chitinous carapaces glistening wetly under the ambient bioluminescence. One prominent creature dominates the upper center third of the image; it is lunging downward toward the Marine's head, its mouth open in a snarl revealing jagged teeth while reaching out with clawed hands that appear poised to strike or grab his helmet.

Its skull features distinct bony ridges highlighted by rim light from above. To both sides—flanking left and right edges of the frame—other Genestealers are visible mid-leap, their bodies angled aggressively toward the center as if converging on the Space Marine in a coordinated attack pattern. Their wet surfaces reflect light with loose brushwork that contrasts against the ink-defined armor plates.

The Background Environment: The setting is a flooded ruin featuring gothic architecture submerged under dark water. Behind the action, large stone archways and broken pillars rise out of the depths on both left and right sides, creating depth while framing the scene in darkness. The background fades into deep shadow where only faint outlines of windows or carvings are visible against the gloom.

The lighting is bioluminescent: a cool blue glow emanates from the Space Marine's sword illuminating floating particles in water around them; this contrasts sharply with sickly green ambient light filtering through murky depths from unknown sources below. The color palette uses desaturated industrial greys and teals for shadows, punctuated by the bright neon green of bioluminescent elements and blue plasma weapon glow.

The water surface is active—painted strokes suggest recent disturbance creating ripples around submerged objects while maintaining a painterly graphic novel aesthetic throughout.

</details> <details> <summary>Example 6 — What is the difference between Architectural Fantasy Linewor...</summary>

Prompt: What is the difference between Architectural Fantasy Linework art style and Watercolor art style?

Thinking:

the user wants a comparison between architectural fantasy linework and watercolor—probably for aesthetic or technical clarity let’s dissect this like a blueprint first principles approach necessary here precision versus fluidity is key architectural fantasy linework demands hyper-detailed drafting think CAD render meets mythic scale every structural element must scream intention from the ink itself no soft edges allowed that’s where watercolor would muddy the waters literally those translucent washes are too forgiving for this level of control you need hard lines to define impossible geometry like floating cities or dragon bones otherwise it becomes a blobfest not artistry spatial hierarchy is nonnegotiable in fantasy architecture perspective must dominate even if surreal elements are present so foreground midground background layers with crosshatched shadows and calculated light sources—no random splatters this isn’t impressionism its structural poetry watercolor’s bleed would ruin the crispness required for linework to read as engineering magic not just pretty squiggles paper texture is a weapon here aged parchment feel under ink highlights depth like weathered stone versus fresh paint those white specks aren’t accidents they’re deliberate erosion markers showing time and tension now contrast that with watercolor’s wet-on-wet diffusion—too organic too unpredictable for architectural rigor the transparency washes might suggest mist but not structural integrity you can’t have both precision and chaos in one medium without compromising the fantasy’s plausibility within its own rules line density is crucial sparse lines for distant spires heavy crosshatching on foreground drapery or stone to imply weight and materiality watercolor lacks that tactile variance it’s all about color temperature not texture so if they want to convey epic scale through detailed rendering architectural fantasy linework wins hands down but maybe the user wants atmospheric depth without sacrificing structure—watercolor could layer translucency over precise ink outlines creating hybrid drama however that risks losing the purity of each style’s intent perhaps they should choose one dominant medium with strategic accents from the other no half-measures here this isn’t a mood board its structural storytelling every stroke must serve either form or narrative watercolor’s softness might soften the fantasy into abstraction while linework grounds it in tangible impossibility the key is knowing when to prioritize control over emotion or vice versa but since they asked for the difference—pure styles no blends just cold hard truths about materials and methods this isn’t a debate its an anatomy of mediums so i’ll dissect their pros cons and inherent limitations like a forensic architect

Composition:

The Architectural Fantasy Linework art style is a meticulous drafting technique where every structural detail emerges from precise ink lines. This style captures the grandeur of impossible architecture with technical clarity—delicate linework defines soaring spires, while dense crosshatching creates shadowed recesses in stone or fabric. The composition's perspective remains intact even amidst fantastical elements like floating cities or dragon scales, all rendered as if drawn by a master architect documenting their vision.

Watercolor art style uses translucent washes to build up color gradually on cold press paper. This approach creates soft edges where forms meet and allows for organic diffusion of pigment—a quality that lends itself well to atmospheric effects in fantasy landscapes. The wet-on-wet application can produce unpredictable color bleeds, while dry brush techniques add textural variety without disrupting the composition's integrity.

Key differences:

1. Linework versus wash dominance – Architectural Fantasy Linework is line-driven; watercolor relies on layered washes for form definition.
2. Edge control – The linework maintains hard edges between elements (like ink outlines), while watercolor's soft transitions might blur boundaries slightly due to pigment diffusion.
3. Texture interaction – In the linework, white paper shows through as highlights in shadow areas, enhancing depth perception. Watercolor uses its own granulation and cauliflower effects for textural interest without competing with structural lines.
4. Color application method – Linework can be applied over colored washes or remain monochromatic; watercolor builds all form from transparent layers.

In a composition featuring both styles (e.g., detailed linework for architecture + atmospheric watercolor for environment), the linework would provide the precise, hard-edged structural foundation while watercolor's soft transitions and color bleeds suggest movement in surrounding elements like mist or light sources.

</details>

---

🛠️ Included: Mordant Prompt Enhancer (Comfy‑UI Node)

A custom Comfy‑UI node (MordantPromptEnhancer) is included with this model. It automatically:

• Loads the GGUF file you select.
• Detects your GPU's VRAM and auto‑tunes the number of offloaded layers, leaving a safe 2 GB margin to avoid OOM errors.
• Handles all tokenization, prompt formatting (ChatML), and chain‑of‑thought parsing (<think>…</think>).
• Node looks for the gguf models in comfy-ui's "text_encoders" folder. Outputs:
• composition (the final, rewritten prompt)
• thinking (the model's internal reasoning)

Installation
Place the node file in ComfyUI's custom_nodes/ folder. The only additional dependency is llama-cpp-python.

CPU‑only (no GPU offloading):

# Windows portable
python_embeded\python.exe -m pip install llama-cpp-python

# Linux / venv / Mac
pip install llama-cpp-python

GPU / CUDA — recommended (pre‑built wheels, no compiler required):

# Windows portable — replace cu121 with your CUDA version
python_embeded\python.exe -m pip install llama-cpp-python --extra-index-url https://abetlen.github.io/llama-cpp-python/whl/cu121

# Linux / venv — replace cu121 with your CUDA version
pip install llama-cpp-python --extra-index-url https://abetlen.github.io/llama-cpp-python/whl/cu121

Supported versions: cu121 · cu122 · cu124 · cu125 — run nvidia-smi to check yours (top‑right of output).

<details> <summary>Build from source (advanced — only if wheels fail)</summary>

Requires CUDA Toolkit, CMake, and C++ build tools (Visual Studio on Windows).

# Windows
set CMAKE_ARGS=-DGGML_CUDA=on
python_embeded\python.exe -m pip install llama-cpp-python --force-reinstall --no-cache-dir

# Linux
CMAKE_ARGS="-DGGML_CUDA=on" pip install llama-cpp-python --force-reinstall --no-cache-dir

</details>

After restarting ComfyUI, the node appears under text/llm as Mordant Prompt Enhancer. Just pick your model and start composing.

---

License

Apache 2.0 — see LICENSE for full terms.