Downloads · 30 days
12
1% of all-time downloads
Giyaseddin/distilroberta-base-finetuned-short-answer-assessment
distilroberta-base-finetuned-short-answer-assessment is a text classification model from Giyaseddin. Use it when you need a label for a piece of text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
The pre-trained model is a distilled version of the RoBERTa-base model. It follows the same training procedure as DistilBERT. The code for the distillation process can be found here.
Downloads · 30 days
12
1% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
1.8K
Public
Repo size
657 MB
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.bin329 MB · 99%
From the Hugging Face model README
The pre-trained model is a distilled version of the RoBERTa-base model. It follows the same training procedure as DistilBERT. The code for the distillation process can be found here. This model is case-sensitive: it makes a difference between english and English.
The model has 6 layers, 768 dimension and 12 heads, totalizing 82M parameters (compared to 125M parameters for RoBERTa-base). On average DistilRoBERTa is twice as fast as Roberta-base.
We encourage to check RoBERTa-base model to know more about usage, limitations and potential biases.
This is a classification model that solves Short Question Answer Assessment task, finetuned pretrained DistilRoBERTa model on Question Answer Assessment dataset
This can only be used for the kind of questions and answers provided by that are similar to the ones in the dataset of Banjade et al..
You can use this model directly with a :
>>> from transformers import pipeline
>>> classifier = pipeline("text-classification", model="Giyaseddin/distilroberta-base-finetuned-short-answer-assessment", return_all_scores=True)
>>> context = "To rescue a child who has fallen down a well, rescue workers fasten him to a rope, the other end of which is then reeled in by a machine. The rope pulls the child straight upward at steady speed."
>>> question = "How does the amount of tension in the rope compare to the downward force of gravity acting on the child?"
>>> ref_answer = "Since the child is being raised straight upward at a constant speed, the net force on the child is zero and all the forces balance. That means that the tension in the rope balances the downward force of gravity."
>>> student_answer = "The tension force is higher than the force of gravity."
>>>
>>> body = " [SEP] ".join([context, question, ref_answer, student_answer])
>>> raw_results = classifier([body])
>>> raw_results
[[{'label': 'LABEL_0', 'score': 0.0004029414849355817},
{'label': 'LABEL_1', 'score': 0.0005476847873069346},
{'label': 'LABEL_2', 'score': 0.998059093952179},
{'label': 'LABEL_3', 'score': 0.0009902542224153876}]]
>>> _LABELS_ID2NAME = {0: "correct", 1: "correct_but_incomplete", 2: "contradictory", 3: "incorrect"}
>>> results = []
>>> for result in raw_results:
for score in result:
results.append([
{_LABELS_ID2NAME[int(score["label"][-1:])]: "%.2f" % score["score"]}
])
>>> results
[[{'correct': '0.00'}],
[{'correct_but_incomplete': '0.00'}],
[{'contradictory': '1.00'}],
[{'incorrect': '0.00'}]]
Even if the training data used for this model could be characterized as fairly neutral, this model can have biased predictions. It also inherits some of the bias of its teacher model.
This bias will also affect all fine-tuned versions of this model.
Also one of the limiations of this model is the length, longer sequences would lead to wrong predictions, due to the pre-processing phase (after concatentating the input sequences, the important student answer might be pruned!)
The RoBERTa model was pretrained on the reunion of five datasets:
Together theses datasets weight 160GB of text.
The annotated dataset consists of 900 students’ short constructed answers and their correctness in the given context. Four qualitative levels of correctness are defined, correct, correct-but-incomplete, contradictory and Incorrect.
In the preprocessing phase, the following parts are concatenated: question context, question, reference_answer, and student_answer using the separator [SEP].
This makes the full text as:
[CLS] Context Sentence [SEP] Question Sentence [SEP] Reference Answer Sentence [SEP] Student Answer Sentence [CLS]
The data are splitted according to the following ratio:
Lables are mapped as: {0: "correct", 1: "correct_but_incomplete", 2: "contradictory", 3: "incorrect"}
The model was finetuned on GeForce GTX 960M for 20 minuts. The parameters are:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Learning rate | 5e-5 |
| Weight decay | 0.01 |
| Training batch size | 8 |
| Epochs | 4 |
Here is the scores during the training:
| Epoch | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No log | 0.773334 | 0.713706 | 0.711398 | 0.746059 | 0.713706 |
| 2 | 1.069200 | 0.404932 | 0.885279 | 0.884592 | 0.886699 | 0.885279 |
| 3 | 0.473700 | 0.247099 | 0.931980 | 0.931675 | 0.933794 | 0.931980 |
| 3 | 0.228000 | 0.205577 | 0.954315 | 0.954210 | 0.955258 | 0.954315 |
When fine-tuned on downstream task of Question Answer Assessment 4 class classification, this model achieved the following results: (scores are rounded to 2 floating points)
| precision | recall | f1-score | support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| correct | 0.933 | 0.992 | 0.962 | 366 |
| correct_but_incomplete | 0.976 | 0.934 | 0.954 | 257 |
| contradictory | 0.938 | 0.929 | 0.933 | 113 |
| incorrect | 0.975 | 0.932 | 0.953 | 249 |
| accuracy | - | - | 0.954 | 985 |
| macro avg | 0.955 | 0.947 | 0.950 | 985 |
| weighted avg | 0.955 | 0.954 | 0.954 | 985 |
Confusion matrix:
| Actual \ Predicted | correct | correct_but_incomplete | contradictory | incorrect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| correct | 363 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| correct_but_incomplete | 14 | 240 | 0 | 3 |
| contradictory | 5 | 0 | 105 | 3 |
| incorrect | 7 | 3 | 7 | 232 |
The AUC score is: 'micro'= 0.9695 and 'macro': 0.9650