Downloads · 30 days
101
8% of all-time downloads
GiliGold/Knesset-multi-e5-large
Knesset-multi-e5-large is a sentence similarity model from GiliGold. Use it when you need a score for how close two texts are. It is set up for sentence-transformers.
This is a sentence-transformers model. It maps sentences and paragraphs to a 1024-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for tasks like clustering or semantic search.
Downloads · 30 days
101
8% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
1.2K
Public
Parameters
560M
2.3 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors2.2 GB · 99%
From the Hugging Face model README
This is a sentence-transformers model. It maps sentences and paragraphs to a 1024-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for tasks like clustering or semantic search.
Knesset-multi-e5-large is based on the intfloat/multilingual-e5-large model. The transformer encoder has been fine-tuned on Knesset data to better capture legislative and parliamentary language.
Using this model is straightforward if you have sentence-transformers installed:
pip install -U sentence-transformers
Then you can use the model like this:
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
sentences = ["זה משפט ראשון לדוגמה", "זה המשפט השני"]
model = SentenceTransformer('GiliGold/Knesset-multi-e5-large')
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings)
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: XLMRobertaModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 1024, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False})
(2): Normalize()
)
@article{10.1162/COLI.a.600,
author = {Goldin, Gili and Rabinovich, Ella and Wintner, Shuly},
title = {Unveiling Affective Polarization Trends in Parliamentary Proceedings},
journal = {Computational Linguistics},
pages = {1-33},
year = {2026},
month = {01},
abstract = {Recent years have seen an increase in polarized discourse worldwide, on various platforms. We propose a novel method for quantifying polarization, based on the emotional style of the discourse rather than on differences in ideological stands. Using measures of Valence, Arousal and Dominance, we detect signals of emotional discourse and use them to operationalize the concept of affective polarization. Applying this method to a recently released corpus of proceedings of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament (in Hebrew), we find that the emotional style of members of government differs from that of opposition members; and that the level of affective polarization, as reflected by this style, is significantly increasing with time.},
issn = {0891-2017},
doi = {10.1162/COLI.a.600},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI.a.600},
eprint = {https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article-pdf/doi/10.1162/COLI.a.600/2573634/coli.a.600.pdf},
}