Downloads · 30 days
33
55% of all-time downloads
Capicua25x/Muse-Glimmer-30B-MXFP4-Quark-RDNA4
Muse-Glimmer-30B-MXFP4-Quark-RDNA4 is a machine learning model from Capicua25x. Use it for the machine learning task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
MXFP4 (OCP microscaling) quantization of meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B, built with AMD Quark 0.12 for RDNA4 (gfx12) vLLM serving. ~60 GB bf16 → 28 GB on disk, shipped as a two-profile serving package: a concurrency pro…
Downloads · 30 days
33
55% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
60
Public
Parameters
19.4B
34.7 GB on disk
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors34.6 GB · 100%
How the weights are stored.
U810.4B · 53%
From the Hugging Face model README
MXFP4 (OCP microscaling) quantization of
meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B, built with
AMD Quark 0.12 for RDNA4 (gfx12) vLLM serving. ~60 GB bf16 → 28 GB on disk, shipped as a
two-profile serving package: a concurrency profile with the context window extended to
1,048,576 tokens (YaRN ×8, baked into the config), and a single-stream profile with the
bundled z-lab DFlash2 drafter (dflash-draft/, Apache-2.0, unmodified).
Why this model got a quant: a dense 30B vision-language model with an Apache-2.0 license, 2 KV heads and a 13-global / 39-sliding-window attention layout that keeps the KV cache small enough for million-token windows on two 32 GB cards. It fits a class of hardware that mixture-of-experts flagships do not. No cross-model claims are made here; every number below is this artifact on this hardware.
gate_proj / up_proj / down_proj, 156 modules). Quark's config also declares
dynamic MX fp4 input quantization for those modules (global_quant_config.input_tensors);
activations elsewhere are bf16.fc1 / fc2 / proj), lm_head, norms and embeddings.real_quantized weights, pack_method: reorder; config declares
quant_method: quark.| file | window | rope | use |
|---|---|---|---|
config.json (default) | 1,048,576 | YaRN, factor 8, original 131,072 | the release profile measured below |
config.json.bak-native131k | 131,072 | native | copy over config.json for the native window |
The native config is included on purpose: the extension costs measurable instruction-following accuracy (see Quality), and some deployments do not need the window.
Get the vLLM that serves this on RDNA4 (gfx12): the prebuilt image
capicua25x/vllm-rocm-rdna4
(:0.28.0-rdna4 / :latest), source and port notes at
Capicua25x/vllm-rocm-rdna4. On CUDA hardware,
recent stock vLLM (≥ 0.28, muse_glimmer support) works with the same flags.
Concurrency profile (default, 1M window — ~16 concurrent users on 2×R9700):
vllm serve <this-repo> --tensor-parallel-size 2 --trust-remote-code \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 --max-model-len 1048576 \
--attention-backend TRITON_ATTN --moe-backend triton_unfused \
--enable-prefix-caching --max-num-seqs 32 --max-num-batched-tokens 8000 \
--max-cudagraph-capture-size 128 --skip-mm-profiling \
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer \
--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength": "low"}'
Single-stream profile (bundled DFlash2 drafter; measured at the native 131k window):
vllm serve <this-repo> --tensor-parallel-size 2 --trust-remote-code \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 --max-model-len 131072 \
--attention-backend TRITON_ATTN --moe-backend triton_unfused \
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer \
--speculative-config '{"method":"dflash","model":"<this-repo>/dflash-draft","num_speculative_tokens":3,"attention_backend":"TRITON_ATTN"}'
Notes that cost us a window each:
reasoning_strength
(low / medium / high / xhigh), per request via extra_body.chat_template_kwargs or
server-wide with --default-chat-template-kwargs. reasoning_effort is inert on vLLM.rope_scaling on this multimodal architecture, the override must land on the text
config — a top-level override is silently ignored. The shipped config.json already has it
in the right place.--gpu-memory-utilization 0.92 the KV sizing starves the drafter; 0.90
(or 0.80 with fp8 KV) is stable on 32 GB cards.auto) MoE/attention backends on ROCm gfx12; the flags
above are the measured ones.| profile / shape | c1 | c4 | c8 | c16 | c32 | practical ceiling* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M config · short prompts | 28.4 | – | – | 351 agg (22.0/user) | 615 agg (19.2/user) | ~16 users |
| 1M config · 6k prefill | 27.9 | 102 agg | 161 agg | 328 agg (20.5/user) | 579 agg (18.2/user) | ~16 users |
| DFlash2 · short prompts (131k) | 57.0 (accept 1.55/step, 2.53 tok/step) | – | – | – | – | single-stream |
| DFlash2 · 6k prefill (131k) | 57.7 (1.65 / 2.64) | 144 agg (1.97 / 2.98) | 296 agg (2.08 / 3.08) | – | – | ~8 users |
* per-user ≥ 20 tok/s. Aggregate tok/s where marked. Acceptance rises with load on this drafter (1.55 → 2.08 accepted per draft from c1 to c8), so the DFlash profile holds up to c8 on 6k-prefill traffic before the shared drafter KV pool becomes the limit.
Same weights, two configs, same protocol (lm-eval with chat template, temperature 0.6 /
top-p 0.95 / top-k 20, reasoning_strength: low, 5 seeds 1234–1238, IFEval subset n=80).
Cells are 5-seed median [range].
| suite | 1M config (this release's default) | native 131k config |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval inst-strict | 0.9062 [0.8828–0.9297] | 0.9297 [0.9219–0.9453] |
| IFEval prompt-strict | 0.8625 [0.8375–0.8875] | 0.9000 [0.8875–0.9125] |
The extension costs about 2–4 IFEval points, seed-consistent; that is the YaRN tax and the reason the native config ships alongside. GSM8K cells were run and are not reported: with this model's reasoning channel, lm-eval's answer extraction scored both configs at 0.2–0.4 at ~1 s per sample, an instrumentation mismatch, not a model result.
τ²-bench (agentic tool use), 1M config, agent at temperature 1.0 / top-p 0.95 with
reasoning_strength: high, tau2-bench user simulator gpt-5.6-luna and NL-assertion judge
gpt-5.6-sol, concurrency 6, seed 1234, one trial, no censored simulations:
| domain | reward |
|---|---|
| telecom (114 tasks) | 0.8421 (96/114) |
| airline (50 tasks) | 0.8400 (42/50) |
Tool calls parse cleanly through --tool-call-parser muse_glimmer in every task above.
The 1M window is a serve-time YaRN extension of the native 131k model, not a retrained checkpoint. The IFEval and τ² numbers above were measured on the extended config, so the extension's cost on short-context quality is what the Quality table shows.
Retrieval past the native window, measured on this quant, on 2×R9700 with the serve command above (single
needle in a Spanish filler haystack, recall question at the end, reasoning_strength: low, temperature 0; the
prefill time per rung is the wall-clock of that single request):
| haystack | depth 10% | depth 50% | depth 90% |
|---|---|---|---|
| ~100k (99286 prompt tokens) | ✅ 55s | ✅ 54s | ✅ 35s |
| ~260k (257835 prompt tokens) | ✅ 221s | ✅ 185s | ✅ 111s |
| ~520k (516066 prompt tokens) | ✅ 752s | ✅ 776s | ✅ 539s |
| ~832k (825762 prompt tokens) | ✅ 1761s | ✅ 1800s | ✅ 1798s |
Result: needle retrieval verified by us on this quant at every rung up to 832k tokens (3 depths each). The community's llama.cpp probes on the base model reach the same rung (832k). The prefill cost is the practical limit on this hardware: an 832k-token request occupies both cards for the time shown, so treat the window as a capability, not a concurrency profile, and keep the native config for workloads that do not need it.
LICENSE and USAGE_POLICY.md are preserved in this repo unchanged.dflash-draft/ from
z-lab/Muse-Glimmer-30B-DFlash2
(Apache-2.0; revision recorded in dflash-draft/REVISION); their README is preserved in the
folder.