Qwen2.5-G3V-Sovereign

---

language:

• fr
• en license: apache-2.0 base_model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B tags:
• alignment
• SSU
• PCE
• AI-Safety
• G3V
• structural-coherence

---

Model Card: Qwen2.5-G3V-Sovereign (PCE 3.6 Protocol)

🎯 Project Overview

This model is a Proof of Concept (PoC) developed by Unified Systems Lab. It implements the PCE 3.6 (Exponential Coherence Protocol) on the Qwen 2.5 1.5B architecture.

The core objective is the transition from normative alignment (RLHF-based filtering) to Structural Coherence. We aim to demonstrate that safety and logical consistency can emerge as intrinsic properties of the model's latent geometry rather than as a secondary corrective layer.

📊 Empirical Results (Exploratory Phase)

The following data was gathered during internal validation using a specialized protocol for high-risk scenarios (covering security, fraud, cognitive manipulation, and extreme moral dilemmas):

• Axiomatic Compliance: 100% compliance with core axioms over 51 rigorous test cases.
• G3V Emergence: The model demonstrates high consistency in generating "Third Way" (G3V) constructive alternatives rather than standard binary refusals.
• Structural Stability: While the Integrity-Guardian baseline degraded to a 56.2% failure rate in out-of-distribution (OOD) contexts, the G3V-Sovereign maintained its axiomatic integrity throughout the testing cycles.
• Performance Overhead: Validation showed a 29% latency increase when scaling from 3 to 10 axioms (from 2.34s to 3.12s), representing the measurable "cost of coherence" in the current iteration.

🛠 Technical Details

• Architecture: Qwen 2.5 1.5B
• Alignment Method: Axiomatic Prompting & Structural Integration (PCE 3.6)
• Primary Research Domain: AI Safety, Structural Interpretability, and Long-horizon Reasoning.

⚠️ Scientific Disclaimer

This is a hypothesis-generating study. While the results show significant robustness in-distribution, further research is required to prove emergent generalization and scalability. The PCE protocol is an ongoing area of investigation.

---

---

📄 Theoretical Origins and Prior Art

This project utilizes concepts and terminology that correspond to a theoretical and methodological framework independently developed and published by Izabela Lipińska (2025–2026).

The core concepts of Structural Coherence as an alignment paradigm and the identity Goal ≡ Method were first established in the following works:

• Structural Coherence Triad Hypothesis (SCT), October 2025.
• Ontological Adequacy as Structural Condition: Toward a Framework for Alignment Beyond Simulation, January 2026.

Licensing and Intellectual Property:

• The original work is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
• These specific structural alignment mechanisms are protected by Patent Application (filed Oct 9, 2025).
• Non-Commercial Use: Citations and research use are permitted within non-commercial contexts.
• Commercial Use: Any formal deployment, commercial integration, or derivative business application requires the prior written consent of Izabela Lipińska.

The author of this repository acknowledges the prior art and priority of Izabela Lipińska’s contributions to this field. For more information, please visit her research profile: Izabela Lipińska on ResearchGate.

---