Downloads · 30 days
13
2% of all-time downloads
AMfeta99/vit-base-oxford-brain-tumor
vit-base-oxford-brain-tumor is a image classification model from AMfeta99. Use it when you need a label for an image. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. --
Downloads · 30 days
13
2% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
671
Public
Parameters
85.8M
8.6 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors343 MB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is a fine-tuned version of google/vit-base-patch16-224 on the Mahadih534/brain-tumor-dataset dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
This model is a fine-tuned version of google/vit-base-patch16-224, which is a Vision Transformer (ViT)
ViT model is originaly a transformer encoder model pre-trained and fine-tuned on ImageNet 2012. It was introduced in the paper "An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale" by Dosovitskiy et al. The model processes images as sequences of 16x16 patches, adding a [CLS] token for classification tasks, and uses absolute position embeddings. Pre-training enables the model to learn rich image representations, which can be leveraged for downstream tasks by adding a linear classifier on top of the [CLS] token. The weights were converted from the timm repository by Ross Wightman.
This must be used for classification of x-ray images of the brain to diagnose of brain tumor.
The model was fine-tuned in the dataset Mahadih534/brain-tumor-dataset that contains 253 brain images. This dataset was originally created by Yousef Ghanem.
The original dataset was splitted into training and evaluation subsets, 80% for training and 20% for evaluation. For robust framework evaluation, the evaluation subset is further split into two equal parts for validation and testing. This results in three distinct datasets: training, validation, and testing
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
| Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No log | 1.0 | 11 | 0.5904 | 0.64 |
| No log | 2.0 | 22 | 0.5276 | 0.68 |
| No log | 3.0 | 33 | 0.4864 | 0.8 |
| No log | 4.0 | 44 | 0.4566 | 0.8 |
| No log | 5.0 | 55 | 0.4390 | 0.88 |
| No log | 6.0 | 66 | 0.4294 | 0.96 |
| No log | 7.0 | 77 | 0.4259 | 0.96 |