CodeBurn vs Opus Clip
Side-by-side comparison from AIMarketly editors — ratings, pricing models, and documented pros and cons. Neither tool pays for placement in this comparison.
CodeBurn
Opus Clip
Rating
4.5 / 5
Rating
4.5 / 5
Pricing
Free
Pricing
Free
Community saves
0
Community saves
4,626
Tagline
CodeBurn - AI Coding Cost Observatory for Claude Code & Cursor [2026]
Tagline
Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience
CodeBurn
CodeBurn reviewPros
- 13-Category Task Classifier: Deterministic classification of every coding session into Coding, Debugging, Feature Dev, Refactoring, Testing, Exploration, Planning, Delegation, Git Ops, Build/Deploy, Brainstorming, Conversation, or General — no LLM calls needed.
- One-Shot Success Rate: Tracks how often each activity type completes on the first attempt vs. requiring retry loops, helping you spot where tokens are wasted on edit-test-fix cycles.
- Multi-Provider Support: Reads session data from Claude Code, Claude Desktop, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Pi, and GitHub Copilot with a plugin system for adding more.
- Cost Breakdowns: Slice your spend by day, project, model (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku/GPT-5/GPT-4o/Gemini), activity type, core tools, shell commands, and MCP servers.
Cons
- —
Opus Clip
Opus Clip reviewPros
- Advanced container alignment
- Pointer event management
- Focus styles customization
- Border radius control on media
Cons
- No local recording
- No isolated audio tracks
- Requires solid internet for 1080p
- Logo watermark removable only by request